HERMES-Catalog

Back to Results List

Groups, Rules and Legal Practice / by Rodrigo Eduardo Sánchez Brigido
(Law and Philosophy Library. ISSN:22150315 ; 89)

Publisher	(Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer)
Year	2010
Edition	1st ed. 2010.
Authors	*Sánchez Brigido, Rodrigo Eduardo author SpringerLink (Online service)

Hide book details.

Links to the text	Location	Volume	Call No.	Barcode No.	Status	Comments	ISBN	Printed	Restriction	Reserve
Links to the text	Library Off-campus access			OB00169098		Springer Humanities, Social Sciences and Law eBooks (電子ブック)	9789048187706

Hide details.

Material Type	E-Book
Media type	機械可読データファイル
Size	XXVI, 190 p : online resource
Notes	Three Tests -- Accounts Based on the Idea of a Social Rule (I): Hart’s Account and the Coordinative-Convention Approach -- Accounts Based on the Idea of a Social Rule (II): Raz’s Account -- Collective Intentional Activities: Shapiro’s Model -- Kutz on Collective Intentional Activities. Building an Alternative Model: Groups Which Act with No Normative Unity -- The Activities of Groups with a Normative Unity of Type (I). Non-developed Instances of Legal Practice -- Gilbert’s Account of Collective Activities -- On Agreements -- The Activities of Groups with a Normative Unity of Type II. Other-Regarding, Developed Institutions. Developed Instances of the Judiciary -- Developed Instances of Legal Practice. Meeting the Tests Ever since Hart´s The Concept of Law, legal philosophers agree that the practice of law-applying officials is a fundamental aspect of law. Yet there is a huge disagreement on the nature of this practice. Is it a conventional practice? Is it like the practice that takes place, more generally, when there is a social rule in a group? Does it share the nature of collective intentional action? The book explores the main responses to these questions, and claims that they fail on two main counts: current theories do not explain officials´ beliefs that they are under a duty qua members of an institution, and they do not explain officials´ disagreement about the content of these institutional duties. Based on a particular theory of collective action, the author elaborates then an account of certain institutions, and claims that the practice is an institutional practice of sorts. This would explain officials´ beliefs in institutional duties, and officials´ disagreement about those duties. The book should be of interest to legal philosophers, but also to those concerned with group and social action theories and, more generally, with the nature of institutions HTTP:URL=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8770-6
Subjects	LCSH:Law—Philosophy LCSH:Demography LCSH:Population LCSH:Ethics LCSH:Law—History FREE:Philosophy of Law FREE:Population and Demography FREE:Moral Philosophy and Applied Ethics FREE:Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History
Classification	LCC:K201-487 DC23:340.1
ID	8000019245
ISBN	9789048187706