Qualitative Indicators of Labour Standards : Comparative Methods and Applications / edited by David Kucera
(Social Indicators Research Series. ISSN:22150099 ; 30)
Publisher | (Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer) |
---|---|
Year | 2007 |
Edition | 1st ed. 2007. |
Authors | Kucera, David editor SpringerLink (Online service) |
Hide book details.
Links to the text | Location | Volume | Call No. | Barcode No. | Status | Comments | ISBN | Printed | Restriction | Reserve |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Links to the text | Library Off-campus access |
|
OB00167419 | Springer Humanities, Social Sciences and Law eBooks (電子ブック) | 9781402053108 |
|
|
Hide details.
Material Type | E-Book |
---|---|
Media type | 機械可読データファイル |
Size | VI, 298 p : online resource |
Notes | and Overview -- Indicators of Labour Standards: An Overview and Comparison -- Country-level Assessments of Labour Conditions in Emerging Markets: An Approach for Institutional Investors -- Decent Work, Standards and Indicators -- The Quantification of Respect for Selected Core Labour Standards: Towards a Social Development Index? -- Measuring Trade Union Rights by Violations of These Rights -- Taking Labour Laws to the Domestic Dentist: Measuring Countries' Compliance with International Labour Non-discrimination Standards -- Towards an Index of Core Rights Gaps -- Employment Protection in Industrialized Countries: The Case for New Indicators -- Measuring Concealed Rights Violations: The Case of Forced Labour Recent years have witnessed a rapidly growing interest in the use and construction of "qualitative" indicators of labour standards. Qualitative indicators, while generally having numerical values, are based on such methods as grading by experts, the coding of legislation, and the coding of other textual sources addressing violations of a more de facto nature. Measuring compliance with labour standards is an undertaking intrinsically fraught with difficulty. For there are a number of possible sources of measurement error, both random and non-random, that are unique to such indicators, on top of those that affect qualitative and quantitative indicators alike. The growing use of qualitative indicators of labour standards thus raises a number of questions about comparative methods of construction as well as the appropriateness of particular methods for particular applications. This volume results from a seminar that was organized by the International Labour Office (ILO) to address these and related questions, bringing together experts from the ILO, universities and NGOs HTTP:URL=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5310-8 |
Subjects | LCSH:Social sciences LCSH:Private international law LCSH:Conflict of laws LCSH:International law LCSH:Comparative law LCSH:Social sciences—Statistical methods LCSH:Law and economics FREE:Society FREE:Private International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law FREE:Statistics in Social Sciences, Humanities, Law, Education, Behavorial Sciences, Public Policy FREE:Law and Economics |
Classification | LCC:H1-970.9 DC23:300 |
ID | 8000058712 |
ISBN | 9781402053108 |
Similar Items
Usage statistics of this contents
Number of accesses to this page:2times