このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加

Output this information

Link on this page

Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium : An Institutional and Policy Framework / by Tim Bunjevac
(Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. ISSN:22149902 ; 87)

Publisher (Singapore : Springer Nature Singapore : Imprint: Springer)
Year 2020
Edition 1st ed. 2020.
Authors *Bunjevac, Tim author
SpringerLink (Online service)

Hide book details.

Links to the text Library Off-campus access

OB00179053 Springer Law and Criminology eBooks (電子ブック) 9789813365063

Hide details.

Material Type E-Book
Media type 機械可読データファイル
Size XIV, 129 p. 10 illus., 9 illus. in color : online resource
Notes Introduction -- Judicial Control of Court Administration -- Models of Court Governance -- The Court Governance Policy Framework -- Court Services Victoria -- Conclusion
This book is a comparative study of judge-managed court systems across Australia, Europe and North America. This book makes an original contribution to the literature of court administration by providing a framework for examining court-service models of judicial councils, the policymaking bodies of courts and tribunals. This book promises to assist court administration scholars, judicial leaders, and policymakers in devising more effective organizational solutions to the contemporary challenges of judicial self-governance. The author Dr. Tim Bunjevac offers a nuanced elaboration of judicial accountability in court administration and a model institutional framework of court governance, comparing key Australian and international models of court administration, including the Australian Federal and two state court systems, Irish, English, Canadian and Dutch models. With a close case study, the author puts his sharpest focus on the Victoria, Australia, which introduced a judicial council in 2014. This book does an innovative job of proposing a new elaboration of judicial accountability in court administration. This book proposes that the likely success of any court system reform ultimately depends on the quality of the interaction between the courts, government, and other justice system stakeholders, which must be rooted in the concepts of organizational transparency and administrative accountability
HTTP:URL=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6506-3
Subjects LCSH:Constitutional law
LCSH:Administrative law
LCSH:Political science
LCSH:Public law 
LCSH:Civil law
FREE:Constitutional Law
FREE:Administrative Law
FREE:Governance and Government
FREE:Public Law
FREE:Civil Law
Classification LCC:K3154-3370
DC23:342
ID 8000071589
ISBN 9789813365063

 Similar Items