このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加

Output this information

Link on this page

Platonism at the Origins of Modernity : Studies on Platonism and Early Modern Philosophy / edited by Douglas Hedley, Sarah Hutton
(International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées. ISSN:22150307 ; 196)

Publisher (Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer)
Year 2008
Edition 1st ed. 2008.
Authors Hedley, Douglas editor
Hutton, Sarah editor
SpringerLink (Online service)

Hide book details.

Links to the text Library Off-campus access

OB00167485 Springer Humanities, Social Sciences and Law eBooks (電子ブック) 9781402064074

Hide details.

Material Type E-Book
Media type 機械可読データファイル
Size X, 296 p : online resource
Notes Nicholas of Cusa (1401–1464): Platonism at the Dawn of Modernity -- At Variance: Marsilio Ficino, Platonism and Heresy -- Going Naked into the Shrine: Herbert, Plotinus and the Constructive Metaphor -- Comenius, Light Metaphysics and Educational Reform -- Robert Fludd’s Kabbalistic Cosmos -- Reconciling Theory and Fact: The Problem of ‘Other Faiths’ in Lord Herbert and the Cambridge Platonists -- Trinity, Community and Love: Cudworth’s Platonism and the Idea of God -- Chaos and Order in Cudworth’s Thought -- Cudworth, Prior and Passmore on the Autonomy of Ethics -- Substituting Aristotle: Platonic Themes in Dutch Cartesianism -- Soul, Body and World: Plato’s Timaeus and Descartes’ Meditations -- Locke, Plato and Platonism -- Reflections on Locke’s Platonism -- The Platonism at the Core of Leibniz’s Philosophy -- Leibniz and Berkeley: Platonic Metaphysics and ‘The Mechanical Philosophy’ -- Which Platonism for Which Modernity? A Note on Shaftesbury’s Socratic Sea-Cards -- Platonism, Aesthetics and the Sublime at the Origins of Modernity
commentary, but by selection and accretion. Those inspired by Plato form as intrinsic a part of Platonism as Plato himself—these are the so-called Neo-P- tonists (a divisive latter-day term which implies discontinuity between Plato and 6 his later followers to the disadvantage of the latter). In the process of its long course of development, Platonism has gathered a long tradition of interpr- ers, whose contributions have been enriched by other philosophical strands—for example Stoicism, which is an important element in the philosophy of Plotinus. To this it must be added that so much of the impact of Platonism is indirect. The Platonism of many thinkers, especially in medieval times, was more often than not implicit, rather than conscious borrowing. It derived not from the Platonic corpus (most of which was unknown at that time), but indirectly through Philo, and theologians like Augustine and Origen. The combined effect of these factors is that the legacy of Platonism is rich, varied and extensive, but eludes the scope of focused enquiry. A further factor complicating assessments of Platonism in the modern era, is polarisation in the historiography itself. Historians of modern philosophy—at least in the anglophone world—readily adopt a model which counterposes ancient and modern. Drawing on a division, which the early modern philosophers themselves invoked, they employ an ‘ancient- 7 modern distinction’ as a principle for organising the history of philosophy
HTTP:URL=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6407-4
Subjects LCSH:Philosophy, Ancient
LCSH:Philosophy
FREE:Ancient Philosophy / Classical Philosophy
FREE:Philosophy
Classification LCC:B108-708
DC23:180.0901
ID 8000064730
ISBN 9781402064074

 Similar Items